Details surrounding the classes in Everquest Next are slowly emerging. During the Everquest Next class panel, senior SOE devs broke down how EQ Next’s class mechanics functioned and what players should expect when customizing their character. It should be noted right off the bat that all of this is subject to change as development continues.

One of the main features of Everquest Next is its multi-class system. Players start by choosing one of eight classes available to them when creating their character. These classes are said to be some of the typical mainstream classes you would find in other MMOs such as the Warrior and Mage, but SOE didn’t reveal what all eight would be. Once a player has chosen their initial class they can venture out into the world and discover over 40 new classes to learn and individually progress.

Unlike traditional MMOs which feature a vertical leveling experience built around one class, players in EQ Next will level up each class independently through a tier system. As players meet the goals of each class tier (for example obtaining a full set of a particular armor), they will progress to the next tier were a new set of goals will be presented to them. Each tier will unlock new class specific abilities which they can then choose from in order to customize their skill bar, but more about that later.

Players will also accrue some form of experience by participating in events across the world, but players will be able to choose what class they spend that experience on. This means that while you may be playing as a tier 4 Warrior you can opt to spend the experience earned on another class you happen to have, but are not currently playing. SOE felt it would be unfair to players to force them into playing a lower tier class just to gain the necessary experience to progress it to the next tier. This way players can always remain relevant to the content they and their friends are engaged in while simultaneously progressing a separate class.

During the presentation SOE listed five classes available in EQ Next including the Blademaster, Rogue, Wizard, Tempest, and Warrior. The term mage had also been thrown around a lot in previous presentations so I am not sure if that represents another separate class from the Wizard. Each class comes with a defined set of “rules” which dictate what armor it can wear, what two weapon types it can wield, class abilities it has access to and weapon abilities they have at their disposal.

If weapon abilities sound familiar that’s because the ability system can be easily compared to the one found in Guild Wars 2. Players will have access to two different sets of four abilities. The weapon abilities are a static set of four abilities which are dependent on the class and weapon. A Warrior for example may wield a two handed sword with four unique abilities, while a Tempest may wield that same sword, but with 4 entirely different abilities. Since multiple classes can use the same weapon type, SOE has designed different stance animations for each class so players can better assess what class a particular mob or player may be before they begin using their abilities.

One thing I found a bit discouraging was the fact that each class only had access to two weapon types. I am not just talking about 2-handed weapons versus 1-handed weapons either. A 2-handed sword is considered a different weapon type than a 2-handed mace. Using the Warrior again as an example, the class can utilize a 2-handed sword and then swap to a 1-handed sword and board. Weapons also come as sets, so if you enjoy mixing weapon types together for dual wielding you’re out of luck. The same goes for shields.

Weapon swapping -and thus ability swapping- during combat similar to Guild Wars 2 is still up in the air as well. At this time players will need to change their weapon outside of combat in order to gain access to the new abilities.

On the flip side of things, while weapon abilities are rigid, class abilities are quite customizable. Each class type has a set of four ability types; movement, offensive, defensive and utility. Depending on the class you are currently playing as, you will be able to slot more abilities of a certain type. A Mage may have access to two utility slots, one movement slot and one offensive slot while a Warrior may have two offensive slots, one defensive slot and a utility slot.

These slots are determined by what main class you’re currently playing as, but the abilities in those slots are up to you to decide. If you’ve progressed several classes you can choose to use abilities from those classes in place of whatever abilities you would normally use if you were playing only as one class. This is how the multi-class system really works.

Ability customization also goes beyond just choosing which ones you will use. Your armor will also affect how your abilities work. Grabbing a certain ring for example, may reduce the energy cost of all teleportation abilities. This extends the significance of armor beyond it simply being an item which carries stats. SOE wants players to choose their gear based around what style of play they wish to achieve. Since class trees weren’t discussed during the panel, I suspect items may fill the role skill points do in traditional MMOs.

So what about dedicated roles? Well there are two sides to this answer. The short answer is: no. SOE has confirmed there will not be dedicated healing and tanking roles, but they did stress there will still be a need for coordination during fights. In fact during the Q/A portion of the panel many players expressed their concern over this decision citing previous games such as Neverwinter and Guild Wars 2 as prime examples of what happens when there is a lack of dedicated roles. In response, the devs explained that they do indeed see the importance of giving players the ability to support their raid mates through non dps actions and promised players their would be opportunities for those who wish to do so.

Finally, SOE briefly touched on Everquest Next’s combat style. While they didn’t confirm tab targeting or action based combat, they did say weapons such as a broadsword would hit all targets in front of the player. The devs also let slip that all attacks would originate from skills, meaning no auto attacks. Overall, the developers say they are aiming for visceral, active movement oriented combat.

Coming away from the panel I felt a little conflicted. On the one hand I like the idea of using whatever abilities from whichever classes I have unlocked. I also like the fact that each class has restrictions on how many of each type of ability you can use. I am hoping this will help balance out the fact that there are over 40 classes while still making each class feel unique. On the other hand though, having only eight abilities seems incredibly restrictive. While I do agree having a smaller amount of meaningful abilities helps reduce bloat and keep players focused on the action at hand, in my eyes it really restricts the feeling of individual class importance.

By Michael Dunaway

27 Readers Commented

Join discussion
  1. legend 1 on August 6, 2013

    but does it have dogs?

  2. Spider0804 on August 4, 2013

    8 abilities…oh SOE you are making such a great game but ruining it in such a stupid way.

    We mmo players like having hotbar upon hotbar filled with abilities….

    A small amount of abilities is nothing new, look at d3 and gw2, look at the backlash of the players and the subs drop in droves once the novelty of a few well animated abilities passes.

    I refuse to play this game unless they atleast change it to 12-16

    Half my entire playstyle being derived from my weapon is crap.

    • TRB on August 5, 2013

      “We MMO players” Don’t lie, tons of people like having less abilities ! Those “MMO Players” you speak is just you and probably your mates.

      • TRB on August 5, 2013

        *speak of, are just you and probably your mates. Before anyone attacks my grammar.

        • Spider0804 on August 5, 2013

          If tons of people like it then Guild Wars 2 would have had a better reception instead of people tiring of the skill system in 2 weeks.
          It has also recieved a large amount of complaints.
          Soe is pretty much copying the system.

          Having 4-8 skills is fine for a moba where you constantly change champions but in an mmo where most people develop a favorite build and stick with it?

          They get tired of it, FAST.

          • Gomez on August 5, 2013

            I am not tired of it even after 1 year (almost). Weapon skills makes it more action and easier to map on a controler

          • chefmadness on August 6, 2013

            Yup agreed i only played neverwinter for like 2 months & GW2 for like a year, haven’t installed it in my new build yet. I am tired of all this cookie cutter class crap! DDO is by far the best class system ever! & as far as powers are concerned I want to use them all all the time & see them in my hot bar all the time! & action based combat is cool but it sucks when you can’t move your toon when using a power. I hate that shit!

  3. Oxidine on August 4, 2013

    Binding 4 skills to a weapon sounds like its going to be alot like GW2 in the fact it will become boring and redundant really quickly.

  4. RevoltFROMCroatia on August 4, 2013

    Off topic: do some dota 2 international 3 coverage !
    On topic: awesome game really looking forward to it.. First I want wildstsr then this ! After this went out i kind of lost interest in eso. 😛

  5. extasist on August 4, 2013

    even if there will be 40 classes its not like you will be able to take them all you want to be paladin well you cant because you made bad decisions as they say game remembers what you done. fun idea

  6. Rokuran on August 4, 2013

    LAWL this is practicly GW 1 AND GW 2 combined into a game if they do this right it will be amazing if not it will fail hardcore, all in all tho it seems to not be to rediculiously technical and would probably have to nerf some things as the game progreses.

    • MrSnitches on August 5, 2013

      How is this remotely similar to the original GW? That was completely instanced without any real open world elements, let alone any destructible environments.

      • Gomez on August 5, 2013

        Multi-class skill combination. This is what he was talking about

  7. Obamu on August 4, 2013

    When will it open?

    I hate companies showing games only to release alpha after they made it public 1 year later, like EON and Blade & Soul.

  8. Galarinn on August 3, 2013

    If I can’t play a tank… I won’t play. GW2 ruined that for me. I truly hope they reconsider.

    • Hmmm on August 3, 2013

      I know Guild Wars 2 tried to get rid of the hole holy trinity but c’mon ruining tanking for you? Just play a guardian then you can be extremely tanky while dishing out the damage. If played and built decently they practically cant die.

      Anyways, to stay on topic to the article I like the multi-class system but am a little worried how each class can only hold 2 different types of weapons and have only 4 extra active abilities at a time, may dumb down that combat and make it become stale really quickly. Everything else about this game seems awesome. Lol if i ever get bored id probably try and lure a lowbie to some higher level area, dig a hole underneath him and watch as lava pit monsters destroy him! XD (assuming stuff would work that way)

      • Galarinn on August 3, 2013

        GW2 didn’t ruin Tanking for me, they ruined the concept of not having a tank. The only thing that concerns me about everything I have heard about Everquest Next is the “no holy trinity” statements. For my personal play style I feel the trinity is needed. I tried to like GW2 but without the trinity, dungeons were not fun for me. But this is just my opinion.

        • ShingamIan on August 5, 2013

          Yep, totally agree. The trinity makes dungeons fun for me, Didn’t like GW2 neither (nor Raiderz). In practice they give me the idea of “everyone on itself” and “save your self if you can”…no team work. So Tera and Aion are my choices right now. But again: it’s just personal.

    • itzteajay on August 4, 2013

      “the devs explained that they do indeed see the importance of giving players the ability to support their raid mates through non dps actions and promised players their would be opportunities for those who wish to do so.”


  9. Mr.Heartless on August 3, 2013

    Having played GW2 for a number of months I have to say that the proposed system sounds too similar to it on its face. Binding skills to weapon types is ok to an extent but when every skill you have access to relies on this, it gets rather stale. Instead, they should implement skill trees, allocate 2 skills to be determined by the equipped weapon, 3 or so from you class’ skill tree, 2 from a utility pool that could either be across the board or linked to the class itself, and then 1 or 2 skills that can be from any of the other classes you have access to in the multi-class system.

    The multi-class system does sound interesting but this has already been done and it has usually resulted in weaker builds and therefore limits the very purpose it was set out to do as persons will always opt for efficiency over uniqueness. I always end up gimping myself with these “hybrid classes” so I do hope they find a better way of implementing it that its predecessors.

    Not really pleased with this direction but I will follow it keenly.

    • serious? on August 3, 2013

      Playing beta and referring to your post, there are skill trees. A first post on this subject is just a ignoramus post. sigh

      • Mr.Heartless on August 3, 2013

        You are playing beta? So is it segmented as I suggested? As in how do the skill tree elements interact with the weapon skill bits?

        • spunkify Author on August 4, 2013

          There isn’t a beta yet. Trust me.

          • Mr.Heartless on August 4, 2013

            I figured he wasn’t, oh well. The game looks very promising. Will be a worthy competitor to Wildstar and ESO at the very least.

            I’d just hate to see the same mistakes recycled in the next gen of mmo’s.

        • golgo28 on August 4, 2013

          there’s no beta but you can sign up for it now.I did so when the beta does start if i get picked I’ll let you know.

      • Kimwer on August 4, 2013

        It’s in pre alpha at the least, and the beta for the building tool Landmarks is only this winter. Who are you trying to bullshit?