EQNext

A few weeks ago, anxious EverQuest Next fans – and pessimistic EverQuest Next doubters – got a bit of good news. Producer Terry Michaels recently talked about a big internal playtest that was going on, and fans reacted like it was the only news we’d heard about the game in about a year, since last August’s SOE Live. To the best of my recollection, it was.

The “vaporware” calls persist, though, and there’s been plenty going on at SOE/Daybreak over the past year to make people skeptical of EQN’s future: the Columbus Nova acquisition, the layoffs, John Smedley’s tumultuous year and departure, and the overall silence regarding the project. All of those are certainly factors that will impact EQN’s development and timeline, but there’s a bigger issue out there that Daybreak has no control over whatsoever.

EQ-Next-Interview-golem

Go small or go home

We joke about it a lot, especially on the F2P Cast, whenever “yet another MOBA” is announced, but that’s not the only online game type we’re seeing explode in recent months and years. A couple of weeks ago, I considered putting a poll on this site asking what people were more tired of seeing announcements for: MOBAs, card games, or arena-type shooters. There’s at least one game announced seemingly every week that fits squarely into one of these three categories.

Almost as an afterthought, I wondered if maybe I should add “MMORPG” as a category for the poll. Because those are still out there… occasionally… well, Skyforge was a fairly big deal this year, and after that, there was… uh… Cabal 2? Echo of Soul? Hey, remember when we used to get one or two “big” MMORPG launches every year? What happened to those?

There’s a simple reason why a lot of companies are trending toward those more “self-contained” games mentioned above and eschewing MMORPGs. MMORPGs require several different game systems, from combat to crafting, PvE and PvP, guilds, huge worlds, dungeons and raids, all of which require a lot of time and a lot of money. By comparison, a MOBA or shooter is simpler, consumes far fewer resources, and carries much less of a risk if it doesn’t turn out well.

All games are passion projects, to some degree, but they still need to make money to justify their often-sizable budgets. In the past, if you were going to try and find a purely pragmatic reason for making an MMORPG instead of one of those “smaller” games, it was the potential payoff. Sure, maybe WoW-caliber dreams of having millions of active players have gone by the wayside, but an MMO with a few hundred thousand players could still be considered a major success.

Update-14-Warframe

Nowadays, however, other games are realizing that same level of success without MMO-sized budgets and time frames. Sure, League of Legends, Hearthstone, Team Fortress 2, and World of Tanks might represent the World of Warcraft-sized success stories of their individual genres, the kinds which aren’t likely to be repeated. But smaller games, like SMITE, Duel of Champions, Warframe, and War Thunder are part of that solid “second tier” of games that can still be very successful, and do so with a smaller outlay of resources than your typical MMORPG.

A big part of this is the changing gaming habits of a large portion of the gaming audience. We don’t as often find ourselves with the two or three spare hours to accomplish something meaningful in an MMORPG, so we opt for the 20-minute MOBA or CCG match instead – or, for some people, a quick session of a match-three game on their phone. That’s just how it is now.

So it all boils down to this: Why make an MMORPG when you can spend less money and less time to put out a game that has the potential to bring in just as much revenue? This is the conclusion Blizzard likely reached regarding Titan, which was canceled as Hearthstone was ascending and (in theory) to make room for Overwatch, and it’s undoubtedly a conversation that’s come up more than a few times in the Daybreak offices: They know we have EverQuest, a diminished but still significant MMO property, but the world has changed. Can they make a game that people in 2016 (or beyond) will actually play enough of to justify the expense?

Warrior-eq-next

The waiting game

If there’s a bright side to things, I think that the lack of information and seemingly endless wait for the game might be a good thing. Take Star Wars: The Old Republic as an example. It launched in late 2011 and was immediately dismissed as a fancy WoW clone, which it was. Design on the game probably started in 2006 or 2007, when “fancy WoW clone” was the way to go; five years, and a few dozen of those types of games, later, and SWTOR seemed archaic right from the moment it launched.

I think Daybreak is watching the skies, so to speak, and trying to tinker with EverQuest Next on the fly, adjusting what needs to be adjusted in order to keep it looking like a “modern” MMO, and not one that started development five years ago. We already know about some of its “forward-thinking” features, like dynamic events and user-generated content, but the dev team wants to avoid making too many “promises,” in case something that sounds cool now is less so in two or three years, when the game actually launches.

That’s not what people who want to see the game now want to hear, and that’s understandable, but simply being a big-budget MMORPG these days puts EQN at something of a disadvantage. This is the biggest risk SOE or Daybreak has ever taken, and they need to get it right. If it fails, it could take the whole company down with it.

the author

Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.

10 Readers Commented

Join discussion
  1. Bishonen on September 28, 2015

    Everquest got one big Factor for it and that is the still Insanely big Fanbase it has from its predecessors, that alone might not be enough to make the Project a Financial Success but i doubt it will be a failure.

  2. Nexthazard on September 17, 2015

    Release the broken game like Warframe did and work with the players while they place but unlike DE build the lore quest faster ffs they already have the combat system down aswell as the crafting systems now to speed things up we turn it into a player run world/game innovation is needed me’lord

  3. o_0 on September 17, 2015

    Gets scrapped, turns to mobile crap.

  4. Grey on September 17, 2015

    Well i just don’t really play Shooters, MOBA’s or card games for too long so an MMO is the only way to go for me…

    • MrkHUN on September 17, 2015

      Same here. MMO ftw!

      • Eric on September 17, 2015

        Yeah same, Even Hearthstone can’t catch my attention. I miss those big yearly releases, it kinda gives an insight into where the genre is headed at that time.

  5. Matt on September 17, 2015

    I for one am still looking forward to playing this one.

  6. kek on September 16, 2015

    founders pack, 49.99$ inc to recover from the shitty decisions and live the hype for a month or two. Hope it lives its potential from EQ predecessors.

  7. Coltar on September 16, 2015

    The most crazy thing they did was to show something like this right at the start of the project and then let it sit like that for all those years.

    Seriously if i would have been them i would have just waited until at least it is near a alpha or beta stage before talking about it. At least there would have been serious stuff to show and even a more remote chance of it been release as stated. Now they say it will not be as it was showcase, so players don’t see really a need for the game anymore. It is going to be another clone of a clone.

  8. Todoran on September 16, 2015

    This is the biggest risk SOE or Daybreak has ever taken, and they need to get it right. If it fails, it could take the whole company down with it…………. whole company down ? I HAVE MY FIGERS CROSSED!!!!

HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY?