Digital CCGs Decking Physical Games
A new report from market research firm SuperData examines the physical and digital card game market, giving estimates as to the size of both in the U.S. and worldwide. The tl;dr version: Both are fairly large and while physical is still bigger than digital, the gap is closing.
This isn't hard to imagine, with new digital games like Hearthstone, Hex, Might & Magic: Duel of Champions, and Card Hunter either recently launched or in development, and countless other free-to-play card-gaming titles available on mobile devices. And, of course, there's Magic: The Gathering Online.
Compare that to the physical card gaming market, which is still dominated by the big three of Magic, Pokémon, and Yu-Gi-Oh! The last of them debuted in North America in 2002, and while there have been a few notable titles since them, nearly all have faded away and none ever truly approached that triad's level of popularity. (For that matter, Pokémon and Yu-Gi-Oh! are several levels behind Magic, but deserve to be in the conversation.) Put simply, the physical CCG market has stagnated, badly, while the digital market continues to grow and evolve.
The simple convenience of digital CCGs is another strong factor in explaining their rise. In addition to most of them being free-to-play, there's the fact that you don't need to have any other local players to enjoy them and can play at all hours. Compare that to physical card games, where you either need a few local friends or a shop to meet at, which may not always be open, may not be conveniently located, etc.
Also, while CCGs, like all games, can be social encounters, my personal experience – especially in a large tournament – is that they tend to be no more social than a typical PvP match in an MMO or shooter. You're matched up against someone you don't know, play a match, and then never see him or her again. Not much is lost, socially, in moving from the card table to the PC or tablet. This is different from the case when digitizing a board game or party game.
One advantage that I think physical card games might have is, paradoxically, their higher perceived cost. We can accept that companies can't give their physical cards away; few people have difficulty comprehending that a deck of cards cost $11.99 or a booster pack costs $3.99. While digital goods and microtransactions are hardly new concepts, I think there's still some resistance to “buying” digital cards, especially when something is marketed as a free-to-play game.
Overall, SuperData says that the digital card game market jumped 32% last year and now comprises nearly one-third of the worldwide CCG market: $1.3 billion out of a total $4.1 billion. The United States makes up about 1/3 of that market share, with 18 million regular players. Back in 2007, Wizards of the Coast said that Magic Online comprised 30-50% of the total Magic business, so it's not hard to imagine that these numbers are accurate.
SuperData foresees growth in the digital CCG market in the future – possibly at the cost of physical CCG players – and I'd have to agree. Like MMOs, CCGs are meant to be long-term hobbies, but the most difficult part is attracting new players. It's a revolution that I think couldn't have come about before the advent and general acceptance of the free-to-play market, which removed the barrier of an initial investment and made it that much easier to try something you might normally have passed up.
What's your take on digital vs. physical CCGs? Do you prefer one or the other? Or do you play a bit of both?
About the Author
Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.
💣 Feature | EA Not Entirely Embracing F2P
I know, the title above sounds like a contradiction to this article from last month.By Jason Winter - 9 years ago
You May Enjoy
New Sci-Fi Shooter SYNCED Launches On PC This Summer, Nanos And All
Players will work in teams of three to defeat Nanos and each other in a world devastated by tech.By Matthew D'Onofrio - 4 days ago
Execute Your First Mission For Deceive Inc. Beginning Today
Infiltrate, disguise, gather intel, and make it out alive.By QuintLyn Bowers - 6 days ago
Unreal Editor for Fortnite Is Finally Here, And It Totally Changes The Game
Check out Epic Games' presentation, then try out the public beta for yourself now.By Matthew D'Onofrio - 5 days ago
You Got Your MapleStory In My Kartrider: Drift
A special collaboration brings two popular MapleStory characters to the racing game.By QuintLyn Bowers - 4 days ago
💣 Feature | A "Spa" Video? Seriously, The Day Before?! Open A Beta, Livestream, Or Please Just GTFO At This Point
Cool... a pre-rendered video of your character sitting in zombie entrail filled human soup...By Michael Byrne - 1 week ago
It's Bots vs Bots In The Latest Anti-Cheat System Unveiled By Irdeto, "Denuvo Unbotify"
Unleashing AI to take out bot cheaters.By Troy Blackburn - 6 days ago
Spellcraft for iOS is good for that. Got better deck design too. Could use more cards tho
I just hope theres something like Vanguard for online play someday but I'll stick with real TCGs for now.
Say I could make my own Anime Deck that I wish and create my own descriptions and Attacks (With a Customizable & Balanced selection of course), That idea would be cool.
Now such a game would be Epic.
Hearthstone (I imagine I will like it when I can get into it :p)
Call of Mythos (was fun but lazy to log in everyday, fun animation, need time to make your own rares)
Fantasy Rivals (poker-like gameplay in a CCG, you have to trick your opponents to overspent mana)
and too many others that I tried and let them go :p
Vanguard (again, I imagine I will like it when I actually starts to play it )
Stars Wars CCG (for a very short time period)