News Flash To F2P Developers: Monetization Is The Hottest Of Hot-Button Topics

Jason Winter
By Jason Winter, News Editor


For all the debates that players will have over mechanics, gameplay, graphics, and just general fun, the thing that will evoke the most heated conversations in any free-to-play game is monetization. It's a truth that, bizarrely, some developers are still struggling to comprehend.

A few months ago, Daybreak Game Company (when it was SOE) took some flak over the “loot drop” controversy for H1Z1. To recap, while it was always stated that paid loot drops would exist, it was buried on a long list of early access disclaimers that most people skimmed over or didn't read at all. “Then it's not Daybreak's fault, people should have read that.” Yes, and when's the last time you read the Terms and Conditions to anything?

More recently, we have Skyforge getting in a little bit of hot water when its monetization details went live on Russian servers last week, which prompted the team to release full monetization details for North America a little in advance of when they were planning to do so.

It's not the first time a company has come under fire, not for its monetization ideas per se – which is another matter entirely – but for how they chose to communicate certain aspects of their monetization. These are the sort of things that are put under a microscope by players, examined, dissected, analyzed, and examined again, more than any other part of a F2P game. It's hard to come up with a proper monetization plan that provides a decent amount of profits without being unpalatable to players; controlling information regarding that plan should be much easier, in theory.


In case you're planning to launch your own free-to-play game in the near future – and I'm sure many of you reading this are! – here are a few simple guidelines to follow:

You cannot hide your monetization details. If any part of it exists on a closed alpha on a single server in Uzbekistan, word of it will leak out and players will assume that what you're doing there will be similar, or identical, to what you're going to do in their territories.

I understand that people feel differently about monetization in different parts of the world, and that companies sometimes have to make things different in Russia vs. Korea vs. North America. That's fine, but be ready to communicate just how your plan will be different than the one that goes live in other parts of the world, and be ready to do it as soon as any part of it goes live, anywhere.

Don't assume you can brush it aside with “it's only alpha/beta” or “it's in a different region.” Both of those might be true, but players will form their first opinions, which will be extremely hard to ever change, from those initial details. As soon as any details regarding your monetization go live anywhere, they go live everywhere. It's 2015, and the Internet exists; deal with that.

People are generally OK with paid boosts to make things go faster, but any time you sell gear directly for money, regardless of the quality of said gear, it's going to give the impression of pay-to-win. The Lord of the Rings Online ran afoul of this years ago, as did Rift, even though in both cases, the gear being offered was not top-of-the-line raid gear or similar. As was the case with H1Z1, the number of people who actually voice their displeasure might be small, but it's impossible to tell how many other potential customers are going to be put off by impressions they read or hear about the game being “pay to win.”


This isn't to say you can't or shouldn't take this route, but be prepared for the avalanche of bad PR that could come with it. If you must sell gear, have a plan in place to explain why you're doing it and make sure everyone in a position to communicate about it knows that explanation to the letter. For Rift and LOTRO, Trion Worlds, to its credit, did communicate the changes well, though Turbine's approach seemed a little more “Who, us?

While I'm sure this article will get the usual mix of “free to play = scam” comments, I don't think companies that make these errors are necessarily being malicious or trying to intentionally obfuscate details. I think that, with all the money and resources that go into PR these days, there's a belief that if they don't make a big deal of something, then nobody else will – and in today's social-media driven world, where one line from a game description can transform into a thousand-post forum or Reddit thread or trending hashtag on Twitter, that's just not how it is. They can put the information out there, and try to steer people in certain directions, but even the smallest of details can explode into a firestorm of controversy – especially where money is concerned and with how sensitive people are to the dubious practices of some free-to-play games.

Share this Article:

About the Author

Jason Winter
Jason Winter, News Editor
Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.

Discussion (12)

Chronosynclastic infundibulum 8 years ago
Games should be 100% free and developers should live just of charity. They, stupid slaves, daring to ask some eur for a stupid weapon!
Ok, now let's go buy a 100 EUR PS4 game.

Grims Bane 8 years ago
I know Aion has a good Monetization system, since its mostly, emotes, xp boosters, mounts, and cosmetics.

Richard 8 years ago
Some f2p mmos are bad and some are great. f2p mmos ftw! lol

Lithkul 8 years ago
Well, half the problem is most the developers when they think of how to get money always leans toward demanding very high prices for what they are giving. They are not looking to get a good general fund going, this can be shown in numerous f2p games. This can be from selling wings for $19.99 in wartune which provides bonuses and a look, to Dust selling weapons that are able to be used by lower skilled players, but at a high premium. To the point that they alienate the audience and only serve the omega whales.

For a game to monetize well, it needs to be able to cater to those who only want to try the game or put very little into it say $5 every so often, to those that want to spend much more. They need to make most if not all that people can buy be for looks or have minimal impact upon the game if it is pvp. I personally would love to spend more money on the f2p games if they made it reasonable, however that is never the case. I'm sure everyone that has played flash games have had their socks knocked off by the prices people are asking and that's the point. No one in these gaming studios have any idea how to cater to the customer and sell product, many times they do such a horrid job that they have to do entire revamps of the game and what they have been doing.

View 1 reply
hawkfun 8 years ago
I Seriously like the monetization way of Warframe DE managed to make it simple and profitable for them.

View 1 reply
NeoS 8 years ago
People will always assume you're trying to rip them off if you don't either charge up front, or make it absolutely clear that your only revenue source is donations.

If your game isn't enjoyable and %100 playable without paying any money, then people will not see it as free-to-play. If your game is competitive in any way, and you sell shortcuts of any kind, then people will see your game as pay-2-win.

I really don't know why these concepts are so hard for developers to understand. People are tired of being ripped off and manipulated. They are tired of clones and empty promises. Either make something worth paying for or prepare to be crucified.

View 2 replies

Read Next

Interview: Star Trek Online Fiction Creation

💣 Feature | Interview: Star Trek Online Fiction Creation

As the Iconian conflict sets in for Star Trek Online players, I had a chance to catch up with Star Trek Online's Lead Designer, Al Rivera, to talk about what goes into making an MMO's story, how far ahead the team has to be, a...

By Michael Byrne - 8 years ago

You May Enjoy

War Thunder Analyzes 15 Thousand Entries Of Feedback From Latest Questionnaire

War Thunder Analyzes 15 Thousand Entries Of Feedback From Latest Questionnaire

That's a lot of data.

By Troy Blackburn - 3 days ago
Old School RuneScape Reintroduces PvP Minigame Bounty Hunter, But With Better Accessibility

Old School RuneScape Reintroduces PvP Minigame Bounty Hunter, But With Better Accessibility

Jagex said the reimagined version of the fan-favorite game mode makes it easier for beginners to join in on the fun.

By Matthew D'Onofrio - 1 week ago
Bungie Teases Destiny 2 "The Final Shape", Cayde-6's Return, And Marathon Extraction Shooter During Sony Showcase

Bungie Teases Destiny 2 "The Final Shape", Cayde-6's Return, And Marathon Extraction Shooter During Sony Showcase

Magickmann almost shed a tear after seeing Cayde-6.

By Troy Blackburn - 1 week ago
Blue Protocol's Latest Video Offers Players A Peek At Character Creation

Blue Protocol's Latest Video Offers Players A Peek At Character Creation

It seems pretty robust for an anime-styled game.

By QuintLyn Bowers - 3 days ago
Blue Protocol Global Launch Delayed Until Next Year, Japanese Version To Launch June 14th

Blue Protocol Global Launch Delayed Until Next Year, Japanese Version To Launch June 14th

But the test will go on as scheduled.

By QuintLyn Bowers - 1 week ago