Judge In Apple/Epic Suit Calls Epic "Not Honest," Suggests Jury Trial Next Summer
Buckle up and settle in because the fight between Epic and Apple will be going on for a while. The two companies had their day in (virtual) court yesterday, with a judge saying that the case should be heard before a jury next July.
CNet is reporting that California Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers "seemed less than impressed with the arguments put forward by Epic's legal team," telling Epic that willfully circumventing the 30% fee imposed by the App Store was "not honest." Rogers also countered Epic's claim of "irreparable harm" by saying that "There's no case law that says that my billion-dollar company is losing some millions and so therefore that's irreparable harm."
Epic obviously disagreed, with its attorney saying that "you don't lie down in the street and die" when taking on "the biggest company in the world." "You plan very carefully on how you're going to respond and you try very hard to keep your head above water."
Judge Rogers suggested a compromise: that Fortnite be allowed back on the App Store, with its money owed to Apple kept in an escrow account for the duration of the trial. Apple's representation said it would need to talk it over, while Epic's counsel flatly refused, calling the measure "unlawful provisions by monopolists." Rogers replied by saying, "I didn't buy that argument before I'm not particularly impressed with it now."
The judge understands and admits her small role in this entire affair, calling herself a "stepping stone" and saying that "Whoever loses is going to take it up and say everything I did was wrong -- that's what litigators do." That means that, regardless of how the initial ruling does come down next summer, this is likely going to drag on for a long time. If you own an iPhone and want to play Fortnite, it's time to look into alternatives.
UPDATE, Sept. 30: Epic and Apple can at least agree on one thing: neither wants a jury trial. Macrumors reports that both companies "agree that Epic's claims and Apple's counterclaims should be tried by the Court, and not by a jury." Apple originally requested a trial by jury, but withdrew the request after learning that the judge didn't want to handle two trials, one each for the claims and the counterclaims.
About the Author
Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.
You May Enjoy
New MMORPG Into The Echo Bills Itself As "A Massively Multiplayer Time-Travel Odyssey"
ETLOK Studios' debut project promises alternate progression system and no pay-to-win or pay-for-convenience.By Jason Winter - 5 days ago
Get Your Regalia Mount In FFXIV Now As The FFXV Crossover Returns
It'll cost you 200,00 Gold Saucer points, but it is pretty sweet!By Michael Byrne - 6 days ago
Pirate-Themed 6v6 Brawler Plunder Panic Scheduled To Launch On Steam Early Access September 17
The retro-style game is the chaotic battle you never knew you wanted.By QuintLyn Bowers - 1 week ago
Funcom Picks Up IP House, Nabs Full Control Over Conan And Other Properties
Conan the acquisition.By Jason Winter - 6 days ago
Warframe's Nidus Prime and Operation: Plague Star Events Now Live
It's a solid infest-ment.By Jason Winter - 1 week ago
Fallout Worlds Is Now Available In 76
Play in customized worlds with special features.By QuintLyn Bowers - 1 week ago