4 Reasons Why Buying Levels Isn't The End Of The World
It's fully out in the open now. Blizzard will offer players the chance to fork over $60 to buy a level 90 character in World of Warcraft, and you'll also get one included with a pre-purchase of Warlords of Draenor.
It's a controversial move, to say the least, though one that's hardly unprecedented. A small number of MMORPGs in the free-to-play space, like TERA, The Lord of the Rings and recently the original Everquest.
Online, have made similar offerings in their cash shops. Is it a bad thing, letting characters bypass most of the leveling process? And is it something we should expect to see more of, especially now that the industry leader has taken that route?
Let me get a little meta for a moment with a question: What is leveling? What purpose does it serve? Some of the most likely answers are that it's a form of training, meant to teach you how to use your character effectively; or a fun, casual way to enjoy the game before having to do difficult content like raids; or it's a form of “work” you have to do to unlock the “fun” content at endgame.
The thing is, none of these reasons make leveling necessary, at least not as it's presented in most games.
You don't need that much training. Yes, you do need some time to get adjusted to your class to learn how to play it properly. But 90 levels and dozens of hours? Consider that when WoW launched, the level cap was 60, and everyone seemed to learn their classes just fine for endgame content then. Granted, you do get some new powers and abilities going from 60 to 90 and WoW's classes have undergone refinements from their original visions, but is there that much of a difference between how you play a level 60 warrior versus how you play a level 90 one now? (Of note, LOTRO's Gift of the Valar only boosted characters up to level 50, while the current level cap is 95.) Do you need another 20+ hours to figure out how to work your new skills into your rotation?
You can still have fun, even at max level. Light and casual content is always available, even at max or near-max level, whether it's adventuring through a nearly-your-level zone or some non-combat ability like role-playing or fishing. And if you still want to level traditionally in a game that offers a boost, to fully experience the joy of leveling, you have that option.
Fun > work. Then there's the “work” argument, the one that gets bandied about a lot whenever “old-school” players hear about a level-boost option: “I worked hard to get to where I was and now you can just buy your way up?” But let's be honest: Leveling in a modern MMO – meaning just about anything post-WoW – is a time sink but not a difficult affair. You can solo all the way to max in most games, usually facing nothing severely taxing. If you could skip all the “boring” stuff, wouldn't you? WoW, and many other MMOs, have been providing options for fast leveling, mostly in the form of XP boosts, for years with little complaint. This is the same thing, with a slightly different form.
And buying levels isn't pay-to-win. Or if it is, it's about the mildest form of pay-to-win. While we talked a while back about what exactly constitutes P2W, buying levels falls firmly in the “no real advantage” category. As mentioned in the last paragraph, anyone can get a high-level character, and there's no technical difference between my “hard-earned” level 90 and one that you bought.
Then there's the real reason why Blizzard, and other companies, are allowing for this right now. Leveling in MMOs is an old, antiquated concept that serves more to split up players and discourage new players more than it helps keep players in the game. If you're new to an MMO that all your friends are playing, how attractive is it to you that you'll need to spend dozens of hours before you can “catch up” to your max-level friends and actually play with them? When a game is new and everyone is about the same, low, level, it's not so bad, but for an aging game like WoW, it's a chore to get to the point where you can play with other people – and isn't that what an MMO is supposed to be about?
To that end, more modern games are smoothing out the progression curve, often eliminating levels and vertical advancement whenever possible. SOE has all but abandoned leveling, as seen in games like PlanetSide 2 and (eventually) EverQuest Next. How much fun would PS2 be if you logged in for the first time right now, a year-plus after launch, and had to spend months getting to the point where you wouldn't be one-shot by a player at the maximum Battle Rank? Or had to grind out 50+ levels before you could join your friends? Yes, it might be fun for veteran players to pwn noobs – at least until the noobs stopped showing up, the veterans started drifting away, and the game eventually shut down entirely due to lack of players. Every online game needs a constant influx of new players and leveling requirements are often a barrier to new players.
PvE games are a little more forgiving on that front, whether it's through a lack of levels or level upgrading/downgrading. City of Heroes famously pioneered the sidekick system 10 years ago, and it was, in a way, the first dent in the leveling gate. More MMOs will follow that trend, as developers realize that inclusion, not exclusion, is the way to get people to play their games in large numbers, and to keep bringing in new players, and that gating off “fun” content after hours of grinding isn't a good idea.
And if they stick with “traditional” leveling, you have to believe that many of them will one day offer the chance to accelerate or buy levels, in the effort to make it easier for people to adventure together. Look on the bright side: You'll have that many more skill-less noobs to pwn.
About the Author
Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.
💣 Feature | Housing Crisis: Is MMO Housing In Need of Renovation?
Player housing is in the works for Star Wars: The Old Republic.By Michael Dunaway - 9 years ago
You May Enjoy
Microsoft Wins In Gamer-Led Antitrust Lawsuit To Stop Activision Blizzard Acquisition, For Now
The gamers can try again.By QuintLyn Bowers - 5 days ago
Fortnite Creators Could Finally Be Paid For Their Work In 2.0 Patch
According to a leak, players would get paid based on the number of engagements their islands receive.By Matthew D'Onofrio - 5 days ago
Apex Legends Adds Third Studio To Help Develop The Shooter's Next "10-15 Years"
When a game rakes in billions, it's easy to see why you want to plan out another decade plus.By Michael Byrne - 6 days ago
Pantheon Dev Vlog Talks Open World, Enjoying The Game With Limited Time, And More
This video is a long one, so grab some popcorn and settle in.By Troy Blackburn - 2 days ago
PAX East 2023: Digital Extremes Drops New "Venomess" Wayfinder, Coming In Season One At Launch
Season One on PC and PlayStation kicks off Early Access in May.By QuintLyn Bowers - 2 days ago
New Act And Season Mode Coming to Undecember In April
Players of Needs Games’ Action RPG have a bunch of new content to look forward.By QuintLyn Bowers - 2 days ago
I would vote for the complete take out of leveling processes beyond the minimum required level of training which may be just after a well designed tutorial.
Wonder if I could get away with having someone had me $60 to let them play a maxed out character on Dark Souls then? Skip the game for a fee. Brilliant, clearly..
a) noobs buy levels, get to maximum level instantly, ruin things (at least PvE - random dungeons, less effect in PvP) until they reach an acceptable level of skill (which could be from 30 minutes to multiples of 10 hours). "people will learn eventually" oh you have no idea how many noobs I see on WoW servers where you receive double exp, imagine skipping all the leveling so they learn even less. (I mind this problem less than the other.)
b) low level plays will die out. Anyone who wants to skip to max level will buy it if he has the option, which means about half as much people will be leveling, there will be less low level random dungeon groups, and low level PvP will be dominated by twinks even more (because there will be less leveling people, the amount of twinks will be a lot higher) - leveling becomes even more boring, less player interaction, more people will buy out themselves, and the result will be that you won't meet anyone until level 90 except in cities and the people who gank low levels.
This will also cause the price of low level "strong" items (crafted and BoE ones) to drop even more (while it's quite horrible now with heirlooms as well), leveling professions will be even less profitable = more expensive (even gathering ones, because less people will actually need mats to craft something for their alts).
buying max levels is good for the devs, not the playerbase. if you don't have time for the game don't play imo.
I will not play any game that will sell levels, you must work for it, period.
Been there when NA Tera decided that it was great idea.. result? lot's of high lvl noobs who no idea wtf they are doing. No thanks.
And dang.. why pay for your boredom? only complete idiots will do that.
Why even bother?
i feel that new games are the same thing over and over again
if EverQuest was the first target based WASD game, then many others are just EverQuest all over again
shooter games are pretty much the same since Quake, Doom or Counter-Strike
racing games are the same
the only thing that changes is the quality of the graphics, but the features available rarely change
so for people who have spent a lot of time on single player and multi player games and feel burnt out, like i feel, i suggest, dont hope for a "revolutionary" game to grab you interest and bring back the old times, this is never happening, just move on to something new