Overwatch Not Being F2P Is The Right Decision For Blizzard – For Now

Jason Winter
By Jason Winter, News Editor November 10, 2015
Share:

overwatch_edit_feat

Like many folks, I was surprised when Blizzard announced that Overwatch would not be free-to-play. After so long a time expecting the opposite, I'll admit I went a little on tilt both last week and Monday on Twitter, especially after reading this interview with designer Scott Mercer, in which he says:

“To support that [hero-switching, a key component of the metagame], we need to have our 21 heroes [for everyone]. Not just, like, one tank, one support, one ranged character or something. You’ve got multiple different tanks and whatnot.”

It sounded to me like another game, The Elder Scrolls Online, whose lead designer insisted the game simply wouldn't work without a subscription fee. We all know how that turned out.

But Overwatch is different... maybe. That's because it has two key potential advantages over the scads of other games that have proudly declared themselves to be the last refuge of pay-to-play/subscription-based online games only to have to alter course a short time later and look all the more foolish for their sudden about-faces. To examine those advantages, let's look at two of the best-known sub-based games out there.

Even if it's down to 5.5 million subscribers, World of Warcraft is still huge. It may need to make adjustments as it ages and its player base continues to decline, but for more than a decade, it's been able to set its own rules and – free-to-level-20 aside – buck the recent trend of MMOs to convert to free-to-play. Free-to-play is all about getting scads of new players into your game and boost its numbers, but even in its current state, WoW doesn't need that, and Blizzard probably pulls in more money as a sub game than it would if it converted to free-to-play.

The second-most well-known venerable sub-based MMO on the market is Eve Online. CCP's game has persisted, I think, because of its uniqueness. Since its launch, nobody has provided anything resembling its kind of freeform space simulation. Want to play something like WoW but don't want to pay a box price/sub fee? There are plenty of options. Want to play something like Eve but don't want to pay a box price/sub fee? Too bad. Want to play something like Eve and don't mind paying for it? Too bad... until recently. Elite: Dangerous and Star Citizen might be taking chunks out of Eve's player base, which is reported to be down since its peak of 500,000 active players, but for a long time, it was the best at what it did, and CCP used that leverage to firmly keep it in the sub-only realm.

overwatch_edit_1

So let's go back to Overwatch. By virtue of being a Blizzard product, and all that comes with that – the marketing, the polish, the easy access on the Battle.net launcher – it's going to be a big deal, at least initially. It will probably sell a few million copies right out of the gate, which means that, like WoW, it's simply better for Blizzard to charge for it. The demand is there, and it's a big enough deal to get people to open their wallets. You'd almost be crazy to do pass up that kind of “easy” money.

Then we get to the second point, the one that I, and several others, latched on to, but which I'm starting to re-evaluate: the competition. Unlike Eve, Overwatch won't have a decade or more to itself. There are lots of nominally similar battle-arena games already out or in development – Nosgoth, Gigantic, LawBreakers, Paladins, BattleCry – and they're all free-to-play. (There's also the not-free-to-play BattleBorn to consider.)

The key questions are: When will they launch, and are any of them actually good? Overwatch is set for a spring 2016 launch, but none of the other upcoming games have anything so firm on their schedules. Beating Overwatch to market could be a huge boon, helping them to latch onto a player base before the juggernaut arrives on the scene.

Or maybe it won't. Getting in gamers' hands early is nice, but quality also matters. We don't know how good any of these final products will be – Overwatch included – but there's no reason to automatically assume they'll be better than Overwatch, either. If Overwatch controls something like 70-80% of the market share in this space, whether through its sheer magnitude or lack of solid competition, then it's 100% the right decision for Blizzard to charge for it. If it dominates other solid games like WoW does in the MMO space or is the only viable choice in its genre, like Eve, it doesn't need to be free-to-play.

Circumstances can change, of course. When asked about whether free-to-play might be in Overwatch's future, Mercer said that “It's something we'll have to consider.” For the time being, though, it's not part of Blizzard's plan. They're putting their faith in the Overwatch team to produce a game that people will choose over the competition, possibly for years to come. Given their track record, it's not a bad gamble.

Share this Article:


About the Author

Jason Winter
Jason Winter, News Editor
Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.

Discussion (18)

gerrt 5 years ago
no interested , i saw the Overwatch’s theatrical teaser they cant even show real gameplay instead they show this fantasy BS movies most bad looking games with mundain gameplay do why do they do this? to hide the fact their game has nothing real to offer overwatch will most likely be another Boring deathmatch game with a few smallish maps plagued with idiotic children and adults with childlike minds .

same game play over and over ZZZZ

laviathan 5 years ago
seems to be a certain lack of new articles on this site after this one, what happened? you guys realize your hyping pay to play or pay to win games, and its not about free to play anymore?

Mern 5 years ago
"RIP Overwatch on MMOBomb"
suddenly Overwatch articles everywhere

Skyshatter 5 years ago
its just - "We will milk $ until people stop buying the game then we will switch to F2P and milk via Cash Shop"

View 1 reply
Aqua 5 years ago
I agree it makes sense for Blizzard to first try and cash in on the popularity of their brand and I'm sure Activision agrees on that. They're also apparently selling it for 40$ which is below the 60$ price point you have for Battleborn (which does seem promising but after the Evolve DLC fiasco I have some reservations about 2K) and other recent Multiplayer only games.

But that interview also raised the important point regarding future content- if having access to all heroes is so important (and from the early impression that does seem to be the case) then expanding the roster in a buy-to-play model would get difficult. It would either split the community the way DLC map packs do or create unbalance.

I guess we'll have to wait and see.

Jokul 5 years ago
You would think Overwatch would have Dotoro's model where it's free for everything, just with a shit tonne of skins and ways to up the prize pool of a championship. Oh well.

View 1 reply
idontlikemyname 5 years ago
i don't really care about paying 40$ or 60$ for the game in fact already pay the 60$ for the deluxe cause the game worth every penny

RenTheRose 5 years ago
umm i think you missed a game called Dirty Bomb in your line up its free to play with mutable characters that each play different and its already out and taking most of over watches players

View 1 reply
Malice 5 years ago
You can just see from watching the live streams the game is going to be massive. It looks ultra slick and for team based gameplay you can see the huge potential.

Character design looks lush with real personality behind all of them, as expected of Blizzard.


You May Enjoy

New MMORPG Into The Echo Bills Itself As "A Massively Multiplayer Time-Travel Odyssey"

New MMORPG Into The Echo Bills Itself As "A Massively Multiplayer Time-Travel Odyssey"

ETLOK Studios' debut project promises alternate progression system and no pay-to-win or pay-for-convenience.

By Jason Winter - 6 days ago
Bless Unleashed’s First PC Update Adds Twisted Spider Queen Boss But May Have To Close The Marketplace

Bless Unleashed’s First PC Update Adds Twisted Spider Queen Boss But May Have To Close The Marketplace

It also introduces new UI improvements.

By QuintLyn Bowers - 5 days ago
eFootball Lets You Pre-purchase Packs With The Game's Most Popular Players

eFootball Lets You Pre-purchase Packs With The Game's Most Popular Players

$40 for a bundle of eight.

By Jason Winter - 4 days ago
Latest World Of Warcraft PTR Patch Replaces Or Modifies Previously "Sexual" Background Paintings

Latest World Of Warcraft PTR Patch Replaces Or Modifies Previously "Sexual" Background Paintings

This seems so small in the grand scheme of things and certainly not where current focus should be for Blizzard.

By Michael Byrne - 5 days ago
Blade & Soul's UE4 Update Goes Live Today, Adds New Dual Blades Class And More

Blade & Soul's UE4 Update Goes Live Today, Adds New Dual Blades Class And More

Includes better optimization and massive changes to combat and dungeons.

By Jason Winter - 1 week ago
Get Ready To Jam With The Bard Class In Trove’s Console Version

Get Ready To Jam With The Bard Class In Trove’s Console Version

Support and heal your party with tunes.

By QuintLyn Bowers - 1 week ago
See More
Live Giveaways