E-sports In The Olympics? Rob Pardo Says Yes, We're Not So Sure
Former Blizzard CCO Rob Pardo spoke to the BBC last week, saying that e-sports should be featured in the Olympics:
“There's a very good argument for e-sports being in the Olympics. I think the way that you look at e-sports is that it's a very competitive skillset and you look at these professional gamers and the reflexes are lightning quick and they're having to make very quick decisions on the fly. When you look at their 'actions per minute,' they're clearing over 300.”
While my first impulse is to chalk this up in the “never gonna happen” category, let's take a closer look. While “fully mental” games are competed for at very high levels – think chess, poker, and various board games – they all lack the visual appeal of video games. And don't underestimate the International Olympic Committee's – on paper, a non-profit organization – desire for profitability in its endeavors. If e-sports grew too big and too lucrative to be ignored, the IOC might eventually give in to public pressure.
All that being said, there are plenty of reasons to believe that we'll never see e-sports added to the Olympic spectacle. First and foremost is the question as to whether public perception could ever shift to all e-sports to be classified as “sports,” alongside basketball, track and field, swimming, and so on. I won't delve too deeply into that argument, other than to state that it exists and would be the foremost hurdle for e-sports to overcome in the public consciousness.
Another issue is the games themselves. Nobody “owns” basketball or the 100-meter dash. On the other hand, Riot owns League of Legends, Valve owns Dota 2, and so on. Adding a video game to the Olympics would probably be seen as far too much of a crass commercial move. For these and probably many more reasons, I think the chances of e-sports making it to the Olympics are slim to none, with a heavy emphasis on “none.”
But who needs the “real” Olympics? Could e-sports themselves band together and create their own Olympic-style extravaganza?
Yes, most of the big games already have their own world championships, but the same could be said of many Olympic sports. Soccer/football has its own leagues, the World Cup, and various continental championships, in addition to the Olympics. Why couldn't the same be done for e-sports?
A big hurdle in the establishment of this kind of event would be, I think, the willingness of all the involved companies – Riot, Valve, Hi-Rez Studios, Blizzard, etc. – to come together support the event as a whole rather than just view it as another way to promote their own brands. That's not how for-profit companies typically think, but promoting the event and the prestige of winning the “E-Olympic” (a lousy title, and I welcome suggestions for a better one) championship should be a major goal.
There's also the question of whether such a spectacle would even be necessary. The modern Olympic games came about during a period when the world was mostly starved for sports, especially international competition. Today's major professional sports leagues were still in their infancy, and there was no radio or television, much less Internet, to keep you up to date with the latest happenings. The Olympics filled a void that no longer exists; if you tried to start them up today, they'd probably be a semi-interesting sideshow, but would have great difficulty establishing prominence with all the spectator sporting options we currently have available at our fingertips.
In the modern world, e-sports would seem to need this kind of exposure even less. Nearly 30 million people watched the 2014 League of Legends World Championships; what would Riot gain from having essentially another World Championship? More than likely, smaller games would try to latch on to the publicity surrounding the event and ride on the big boys' coattails, which doesn't serve those larger companies at all.
All in all, I'd put the chances of e-sports making the Olympics at effectively nil, with the chances of an E-Olympics coming into existence at slight, but not totally zero. Maybe the smaller e-sports companies will find a way to band together and make the event happen, and – if they have the patience and the funds – grow it large enough that the bigger companies will want to be a part of it.
The question is, would they give out real gold medals or would you just get a gold medal tag to use on the game's forums?
About the Author
Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.
💣 Feature | Our Predictions For Free-to-Play In 2015
I could preface this by saying that 2014 was a wild year, and then list off all the crazy things that happened in gaming.By Jason Winter - 8 years ago
You May Enjoy
GDC 2023: NCSOFT Unveils Its Digital Human Technology In New Trailer For Project M
AI is taking over.By Troy Blackburn - 5 days ago
ARK: Extinction Expansion Coming To Nintendo Switch On April 11
The third expansion pack for ARK: Survival Evolved contains a new map plus fresh creatures and challenges.By Matthew D'Onofrio - 1 week ago
Real-Time F2P Battler 'Spellcraft' Will Debut Public Alpha Testing On Steam In April
Control an entire team of heroes in real-time battler Spellcraft.By Troy Blackburn - 6 days ago
Microsoft Wins In Gamer-Led Antitrust Lawsuit To Stop Activision Blizzard Acquisition, For Now
The gamers can try again.By QuintLyn Bowers - 6 days ago
Apex Legends Adds Third Studio To Help Develop The Shooter's Next "10-15 Years"
When a game rakes in billions, it's easy to see why you want to plan out another decade plus.By Michael Byrne - 1 week ago
Bungie Honors Lance Reddick In This Week At Bungie Post, Zavala Still Has A Few Performances Coming
Discuss his performances left to come in the game.By QuintLyn Bowers - 3 days ago
However, the most important factor is sports have stood the test of time. E-sports will NEVER stand with the test of time. A few years from now, LoL may be around, but people will have moved on to better games. Games always evolve, and people will always move on to things with better graphics, etc. Unlike video games, sports will always be there. Soccer, Equestrian, etc have existed for decades, centuries even.
By the way, if you think Sports isn't mentally AND physically taxing, you really need to get out more...
Another aspect, "Nobody “owns” basketball or the 100-meter dash. On the other hand, Riot owns League of Legends, Valve owns Dota 2, and so on.". There's stupid suggestion but if there will be league or olympics for computer games, why don't create independent moba game, combining some elements of most famous moba games and creating official moba game that no one owns (or it owns organisation that won't do p2w or p2p). What do you think about that?
sure nobody can own sports nor the idea of sport . but there will always be someone in the background who knocks profit out of everything which has to do whit sports and has the right to do so no matter what (money talks). valve ows dota, riot owns league of legends. yeah sure we know that fact and sure its obvious that they make money with it. but really cmon. someone is making the real big deal money out of sports but the greedy ones who are acting in the background will always be in disguise.
imo there is no niche in the typical oplympics and will never be accepted and i dont want to see it there. because a lot of people dislike the idea of gaming becoming a sport or dont and will never accept the idea of "gaming" becomes more and more popular in ways of competitive sports.
i think e-sports will grow stong but will never cross its way with the typical olympics. it will become its own "highlight" for younger generations.
e-sports or ... e-olympics deserves its own platform.
Imo the best points that games should and will not be in the Olympics, have been mentioned in the editorial by Jason: , We as gamers do not see e-sports at the same level as physical sports, non-gamers will never do.
In video games a single match on average takes quite long compared to most sports - a game of Hearthstone is about 8-10 minutes (longer with control decks, slightly shorter with aggro and one-sided card draws), 20-30 minutes in Starcraft2 (have seen a 75 minute match as well), same for DotA2 or League. That's one game, and one game does not give you a real result in most cases: the opponent can try something cheesy or catch you off-guard and win, dropping out due to something like that would be extremely frustrating and not really interesting to watch either, you need Best of 3 from at least round 16 on (at least Bo5 for an RNG-based game like Hearthstone), at least Best of 5 for the first 4 places (including loser's match for 3rd/4th place) and Bo7 for the finals.
The point I'm getting to? Unless you featured just one game (which would be an extreme advertisement for that game) you needed to take a really long time for each game to be played out, you probably want to watch every match from the round of 16 (or even 32) so they can't overlap, and you might want to watch multiple games (so not just Hearthstone for example but also Dota), so those games can't overlap either. You probably don't want to watch the same game a day for 8+ hours (that's also extremely tiring for the players as well), but then it stretches out for days.
Some numbers: R16 with Bo3: 2.5 games on average (SC2 or ARTS), 25 minutes each: 62 minutes to decide who advances, about 70 with breaks, you have 8 of those + 4 in the Round of 8, that's 12 * 70 = 840 minutes = 14 hours.
R4 with Bo5: 4 games on average, 25min games: 100 minutes, 110 with breaks, 2 of these: 220 minutes = 3.6 hours, + another of this for the 3rd place: 5.5 hours (330 minutes).
Finals: Bo7, 5.5 games on average, 25min each: 137 minutes, about 150 with breaks (2.5 hours).
Total: 840 + 150 + 330 = 1320 minutes, that's 22 hours, and that's just one game after having your top 16 players with really generous match-times. You have at least 2 such games to play, that's already 44 hours, you can't play more than 8 hours a day (that's 4 for one game which is still quite a lot for the commentators), so that'd add at least 4 days to the Olympics in itself, I don't think that this is affordable.
Olympics = physical effort
E-Olympics = mental effort
both requires athletes
If we look at the 3 sports that was mentioned -- basketball, track and field, and swimming -- we think of LeBron James, Usain Bolt and Michael Phelps. So what, we put Faker's name on that list? That would be silly.
Esport is just a competition hobby, like yo-yos, RC racing, cup stacking, etc.