Boss Key: LawBreakers Moved On From F2P So It Wouldn't "Disjoint Our Users" Or "Force Them Into DLC"
LawBreakers still isn't going to be free-to-play, and Boss Key Productions still explains its reasons in interviews every now and then. And the reasons given, while understandable in the broader sense, still seem puzzling when you find out exactly what was considered.
Speaking to MCV, Lead Designer Dan Nanni talked about the early days of LawBreakers' design and how the core gameplay loop was negatively affected by the need to inject free-to-play mechanics into the game. He wouldn't be the first or last designer to notice that sort of thing, but, as with Boss Key President Cliff Bleszinski's statements about energy systems from earlier this year, it seems that the developer was looking at the wrong kind of F2P implementation:
"There can’t be a pay-to-win mechanic, there can’t be a grind mechanic, people have to be able to access the same exact content at the exact same time. After giving it a good amount of thought, we realised it probably made more sense to give it a premium price. That way, we don’t disjoint our users, we don’t force them into DLC purchases where some people have maps and others don’t. No, you pay one price to entry, get maps and game modes at the same time. Everyone is always playing at an even field."
"Splitting your player base" by making some modes or maps available to paid players and some not is virtually unheard of in the realm of competitive PvP games -- which is why none of the successful games do it. And yet they succeed. The notion that this would be a valid way to generate revenue from a F2P game seems to stem from a single-player or "online competitive" (like, say, Gears of War) rather than "MMO-style" game mentality, which might be the mindset of the majority of Boss Key's personnel.
I'm not against LawBreakers being pay-to-play; Overwatch is, and is doing quite well, though the Blizzard marketing machine and overall footprint certainly helps. If it doesn't work for LawBreakers, though, Boss Key will need to start over, and maybe bring on someone who actually has experience developing a solid F2P title. It increasingly looks like they don't have that kind of knowledge in-house.
Related Articles
About the Author
Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.
More Stories by Jason WinterRead Next
The next Open Beta update for Hi-Rez' free-to-play shooter Paladins is on its way and it's bringing with it a new archer champion -- Sha Lin - the Desert Wind. The champion is described by the devs as having more of a "true...
You May Enjoy
You want that painting of unicorns and rainbows for your house? Yeah, apparently you can get it.
It’s time to head to the unexplored lands of Near Harad.
These drives will happen in other seasons, too.
It's still console exclusive, though, being available on only the Ps4 and PS5.
Most impacted will be those in marketing and publishing.
The company reduces 2nd quarter expectations by 30%.
The western market still thinks that b2p is better than f2p because it won't have an abusive cash shop like some f2p games have, so many publishers decided that it would be an awesome ideia to exploit that and make extra money with the b2p model and after a month or 2 implement the same cash shop people hate
This game WILL have a cash shop with cosmetics and progression items and it WILL become f2p after a few months
Overwatch success is mainly because its Blizzards product, even if i dont play their games, they do know what they are doing. I`m sure Lawbreakers developers are already thinking of how to go f2p if their plan for pay to play fails. Then again i can be mistaken.