Jagex Sued For Violating Muted RuneScape Player's "Free Speech" And "Human Rights"
In July of 2019, RuneScape player and streamer Anro Elansari was "muted" from the game, which he claims to have streamed for over 2,000 hours. He appealed his punishment, and when it was denied, he did what any sensible person would do: He sued Jagex and its parent company at the time of the incident, Shanghai Fukong Interactive Entertainment.
That has not gone well for Elansari, a former law student who has also sued, among others, the United States Marine Corps for not letting him enlist. In his initial suit, he laid out -- via handwriting -- his complaints, which included "breach of contract" and "violation of due process, discrimination/free speech, human rights." It was dismissed by Judge Mark A. Kearney, "for failure to state plausible claims." The judge called his complaint "so confused, ambiguous, vague, or otherwise unintelligible that its true substance, if any, is well disguised."
In true litigious fashion, Elansari appealed the decision, which was also struck down last week by three circuit judges in California. In this appeal, Elansari re-iterated his discrimination claim, invoking the Fourteenth Amendment. The court responded thusly:
"Even generously construing Elansari's complaint ... at no point either in the District Court or on appeal has Elansari alleged losing access to Jagex's online game due to discrimination based on any of the ground protected by Title II."
Title II of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination in public areas (hotels, movie theaters, etc.) based on race or other factors. Whether an online game counts as such a public area might be questionable.
To be fair to Elansari, he claims that Jagex offered no explanation for the action taken against him. We contacted Jagex to try and learn more, and the company responded that, while it can't comment on this particular case, "Mutes can be avoided by following the RuneScape rules, which are in place to keep RuneScape a safe and -- above all -- enjoyable space."
But even taking that into account, especially given his litigious background, it's unlikely that Elansari was punished due to his race and more likely that he simply misbehaved in the game and got hit with the banhammer -- or mutehammer, in this case -- the same as countless other misbehaving players. Somehow, I don't think Jagex will be in any hurry to lift the restrictions on his account.
About the Author
Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.
Bungie Rolls Back Destiny 2 Servers, Deleting Two Hours Of Progress
A bungie cord is springy and, when stretched out, will quickly snap back into its original position.By Jason Winter - 3 years ago
You May Enjoy
Could LawBreakers Be Making A Comeback? Cliffyb Says Negotiations Could Happen With Nexon For The Rights
A LawBreakers revival is on the mind of Cliff Bleszinski.By Troy Blackburn - 1 week ago
💣 Feature | Top 7 Most Complex MMORPGs You Can Play Now
If you're looking for an MMORPG game with a little more meat on the bones, this list should be for you.By Troy Blackburn - 3 days ago
Developer Everguild Reveals New Faction And Closed Alpha Date For Warhammer 40,000: Warpforge
Take part in a demo now to be prioritized for the closed alpha.By QuintLyn Bowers - 5 days ago
Activision Blizzard Fined A Measly €5,000 For Not Disclosing Loot Boxes In Diablo Immortal
This is the consequence for not disclosing randomized in-game purchases, in accordance with rules introduced by PEGI in 2020.By Matthew D'Onofrio - 1 week ago
Black Desert Online Drops Trailers For Woosa and Maegu’s Class Awakening, Arriving Just In Time For The Next Expansion
See the Twins’ new skills in action.By QuintLyn Bowers - 5 days ago
Blue Protocol Global Launch Delayed Until Next Year, Japanese Version To Launch June 14th
But the test will go on as scheduled.By QuintLyn Bowers - 1 week ago
Why do so many companies start off on the right track and allow all and everything to be shown and allow free speech but, as soon as they gain mass wealth seem to think they have powers and laws over our views likes and dislikes, and with that, they start pulling back the rains because they now have lawyers and big pay checks. This is extremely hypercritical of them all to go into a lock down from there initial freedom which made them who they were.