U.S. Court Dismisses Wargaming's Claims Against Former World Of Tanks: Blitz Developers

Jason Winter
By Jason Winter, News Editor Posted:
Share:

Ten months ago, we learned that Wargaming was suing a developer consisting primarily of former employees who had worked on World of Tanks: Blitz, claiming that "Blitz Team" (or "BlitzTeam") had infringed upon its copyright and trademarks. The company has since changed its name to Press Fire Games, and the suit has been dismissed in the United States, but Wargaming continues to press its claims.

As GamesIndustry.biz reports, Wargaming contends that Press Fire is using "source code of its proprietary engine to build its debut game Battle Prime." Judge Cormac J. Carney stated that, despite Wargaming having offices in the U.S., both companies are based out of Belarus, and thus the U.S. has "little interest in adjudicating this suit."

In a follow-up statement, Wargaming told GI.biz that its "main objective is to protect its rights" and that it is going to appeal the order. The developer has five other lawsuits pending in Belarus against Press Fire, whose game was removed from the Google Play Store as a result of these events.

Share:
Got a news tip? Contact us directly here!

About the Author

Jason Winter
Jason Winter, News Editor

Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.

More Stories by Jason Winter

Discussion (3)

Cloak 3 years ago
If Election fraud can be dismissed by the courts. This is a spec of dust to them.

TreadHead 3 years ago
"Press Fire is using “source code of its proprietary engine to build its debut game Battle Prime.”
That does sound pretty serious but why did they file in the US if they are both from Belarus?

kethuwu 3 years ago
Special addendum, just for rickshaw should he happen to view this: In America, we refer to individual game companies as singular entities (which, y'know, they are). Thus it's "Wargaming has," not "Wargaming have" :)


Read Next

You May Enjoy