EU Surveys Game Companies Over Microsoft Purchase Of Activision As "Gamers" Sue Against Deal In The US
The ability for customers to file antitrust suits in the US has opened the door to citizens trying to block the Microsoft/Activision deal.
We previously reported on the EU commission investigating the Activision Blizzard purchase by Microsoft and reaching out to get opinions from the general public. Now, Reuters is reporting that they've been able to get a glimpse at a 91-page questionnaire that the commission sent to other gaming companies to gather their thoughts on the deal.
Questions include asking rival companies what they think the "strategy" behind the purchase could be for Microsoft and move into asking the companies about which games pose the biggest "threat" if pulled from other consoles. This is clearly in response to PlayStation's constant rattling of the "Call of Duty" saber.
Regulators also wanted game companies to chime in on the impact the deal could have on cloud gaming and what titles could be offered via a subscription service (a la Game Pass) and if companies saw a legitimate rival to Call of Duty being viable if it should ever become exclusive (something Microsoft has repeatedly claimed would not happen).
Companies were given until a few days before Christmas to reply but, to date, no replies have been made public.
On the other side of the pond, the FTC has already filed a suit challenging this purchase, but now a group of Americans calling themselves "Video Gamers" are filing their own antitrust claim in a California court to try and stop the deal.
In a statement, plaintiffs' attorney Joseph Saveri in San Francisco said, "As the video game industry continues to grow and evolve, it's critical that we protect the market from monopolistic mergers that will harm consumers in the long run." While the deal may not result in a monopoly by the strictest definition, the claimants are saying that the deal gives Microsoft "far-outsized market power in the video game industry," and the ability to "foreclose rivals, limit output, reduce consumer choice, raise prices, and further inhibit competition."
The suit was filed by a group of 10 gamers from California, New Mexico, and New Jersey.
Related Articles
- Spellburst Is Back, The Draenei And Starship Keywords Arrive, And More From Hearthstone's "The Great Dark Beyond" Expansion Reveal
- Overwatch 2 Reveals A Spooky Season 13 While Rumors Of A Mobile Project And New "Major Feature" Swirl
- World Of Warcraft's 20th Anniversary Event Patch Gets A Release Date And It Is VERY Soon
About the Author
Mike “Magicman” Byrne has been a part of the MMOBomb family for years and serves as the site’s current Editor-in-Chief. His love for MMOs and gaming in general has led him to covering games for numerous gaming websites including Gamebreaker TV and XIV Nation where he proudly displays his fanboy flag for FFXIV:ARR.
More Stories by Michael ByrneRead Next
You got 14 days to grab what you can!
You May Enjoy
Lots of puns and lots of scary rewards are up for grabs.
This one could be interesting, but I still think there's kinks to work out.
Log in now to claim a free Nexus-Prince Shaffar card, complete with Spellburst.
Earn exotics tied to previous seasons.
Even ranged combat is getting sneaky.
"If we knew everything we know now, we’d have definitely delayed a few weeks."
Discussion (0)