EverQuest Comes Under Fire For Nerfing Rewards After Players Spent On New Feature
Earlier this month, Darkpaw Games and Daybreak Game Company released the Overseer system for EverQuest. Similar to a system in EverQuest II, as well as other MMORPGs, the Overseer system let players send Agent NPCs out on missions with a timer, returning with rewards for your character.
Shortly after its launch, however, Darkpaw made significant changes to the system, fixing bugs -- which was good -- and radically changing its reward structure -- which was not so good, as perceived by the community. While I'm not an EQ player and can't speak with expertise to the level of these changes, it's clear that the response on the forums has been highly negative. One item that was originally obtained with the rewards from the system, McKenzie's Special Brew, apparently rose in price from 167 Tetradrachms to 26,250 Tetradrachms. While some players accept that 167 was far too low of a price, a 160x raise in price has been seen as a radical overcorrection.
Compounding this issue is the fact that several players spent money on Agent Packs, with some players spending over $100 to make the most of the system which, as advertised, seemed to have very good returns. Now that those returns have been greatly diminished, many want refunds, but are being told by the company that that won't be happening. "Bait and switch" is the catchphrase of the day.
It's likely, however, that the issue isn't due to any intentional malice on the part of Daybreak and Darkpaw but a simple internal error regarding the value of rewards. In researching this piece, I found an excellent blog post from a former EQ player who said that these kinds of mistakes aren't new. He references an earlier system, Monster Missions, that similarly offered great rewards for little risk, which unsurprisingly led players to do those instead of actually playing their characters and doing traditional content. In summary, he said that "whoever designed the Overseer system was either comically naive, embarassingly uninformed or, most likely, both."
So what, if anything, should Daybreak and Darkpaw do? Returning the rewards to their previous levels probably isn't on the table, though some slightly lower cost might be acceptable. Refunds, even partial ones, should also probably be considered. That said, given everything that's happened over the past few years, one might also question the wisdom of dropping chunks of $100 or more on anything Daybreak offers. Caveat froglok.
Thanks to MMOBomber Derek for providing us with this tip!
About the Author
Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.
You May Enjoy
Myth Of Empires Creators Set Up Launcher To Purchase The Game Directly
Still not on Steam, pending DMCA takedown and related lawsuits.By Jason Winter - 1 week ago
Mortal Online 2's Last Beta Patch Adds House Decorations And A Journal
Also: New trolls and "updated fish stats."By Jason Winter - 2 weeks ago
Call Of Duty Developers Delay New Season By Almost 2 Weeks
This delay is for both Vanguard and Warzone.By QuintLyn Bowers - 1 week ago
Celebrate The Lunar New Year With Team Fight Tactics’ Gifts Of The Golden Lantern Event
Earn firecrackers, a Year of the Tiger egg, and more.By QuintLyn Bowers - 6 days ago
Brave The Cold In Aura Kingdom's Valleys Of Ice Hearts Update
Level cap raise, two new zones. two new dungeons, and an Eidolon story dungeon.By Jason Winter - 1 week ago
PSA: Warframe Players Will Have To Wait Unil The Team Returns For Formorian Sabotage And Razorback Armada To Go Live
They’re still on vacation, y’all.By QuintLyn Bowers - 1 week ago