EverQuest Comes Under Fire For Nerfing Rewards After Players Spent On New Feature
Earlier this month, Darkpaw Games and Daybreak Game Company released the Overseer system for EverQuest. Similar to a system in EverQuest II, as well as other MMORPGs, the Overseer system let players send Agent NPCs out on missions with a timer, returning with rewards for your character.
Shortly after its launch, however, Darkpaw made significant changes to the system, fixing bugs -- which was good -- and radically changing its reward structure -- which was not so good, as perceived by the community. While I'm not an EQ player and can't speak with expertise to the level of these changes, it's clear that the response on the forums has been highly negative. One item that was originally obtained with the rewards from the system, McKenzie's Special Brew, apparently rose in price from 167 Tetradrachms to 26,250 Tetradrachms. While some players accept that 167 was far too low of a price, a 160x raise in price has been seen as a radical overcorrection.
Compounding this issue is the fact that several players spent money on Agent Packs, with some players spending over $100 to make the most of the system which, as advertised, seemed to have very good returns. Now that those returns have been greatly diminished, many want refunds, but are being told by the company that that won't be happening. "Bait and switch" is the catchphrase of the day.
It's likely, however, that the issue isn't due to any intentional malice on the part of Daybreak and Darkpaw but a simple internal error regarding the value of rewards. In researching this piece, I found an excellent blog post from a former EQ player who said that these kinds of mistakes aren't new. He references an earlier system, Monster Missions, that similarly offered great rewards for little risk, which unsurprisingly led players to do those instead of actually playing their characters and doing traditional content. In summary, he said that "whoever designed the Overseer system was either comically naive, embarassingly uninformed or, most likely, both."
So what, if anything, should Daybreak and Darkpaw do? Returning the rewards to their previous levels probably isn't on the table, though some slightly lower cost might be acceptable. Refunds, even partial ones, should also probably be considered. That said, given everything that's happened over the past few years, one might also question the wisdom of dropping chunks of $100 or more on anything Daybreak offers. Caveat froglok.
Thanks to MMOBomber Derek for providing us with this tip!
About the Author
Jason Winter is a veteran gaming journalist, he brings a wide range of experience to MMOBomb, including two years with Beckett Media where he served as the editor of the leading gaming magazine Massive Online Gamer. He has also written professionally for several gaming websites.
You May Enjoy
Square Enix Offers Up More Details On Belt Removal In Final Fantasy XIV’s Endwalker Expansion
Loosing belts means you have room for other things.By QuintLyn Bowers - 6 days ago
Final Fantasy XIV Live Letter Covered Lots Of Exciting Job Adjustments And Quality Of Life Changes
We’re going to have to wait a bit longer for the Data Center Travel system, though.By QuintLyn Bowers - 1 week ago
New MMORPG Into The Echo Bills Itself As "A Massively Multiplayer Time-Travel Odyssey"
ETLOK Studios' debut project promises alternate progression system and no pay-to-win or pay-for-convenience.By Jason Winter - 1 week ago
Century: Age of Ashes Delayed Due To Battlefield 2042 Delay
Sometimes, it’s like that.By QuintLyn Bowers - 4 days ago
Grab Your Demonslaying Gear, You’ll Need It For Revelation Online’s October Update
The denizens of the City of the Demon Gods are ready to go to war.By QuintLyn Bowers - 5 days ago
Latest World Of Warcraft PTR Patch Replaces Or Modifies Previously "Sexual" Background Paintings
This seems so small in the grand scheme of things and certainly not where current focus should be for Blizzard.By Michael Byrne - 1 week ago