Lawyers For California's DFEH Could Be Violating Ethics In Activision Blizzard Legal Battle
It appears 2 DFEH lawyers were previously part of the EEOC's investigation into the gaming giant.
Legal actions are messy. Governments fighting corporate parties can be even messier. What really makes things messy is when government employees move from one organization to another...both of which may be investigating the same entity. As GamesIndustry.Biz reports, this could be the case in California's DFEH case against Activision Blizzard.
To catch you up, The EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) recently settled with Activision Blizzard for $18 million after a lengthy investigation into the company's practices. California's DFEH (Department of Fair Employment and Housing), which is currently embroiled in its own investigation and filing against Activision Blizzard, is contesting that settlement claiming, among other things, that it infringes on some of the aspects of their own case and could make their investigation more challenging.
So...where's the violation? Well, in response to the DFEH's filing against the EEOC ruling, the EEOC filed documents claiming that two lawyers in leadership positions for the DFEH actually worked for the EEOC previously and were, in fact, part of the EEOC's investigation into Activision Blizzard. You see, it all comes down to timing.
While the DFEH DID seek and bring on new counsel to file this motion against the EEOC settlement, the EEOC is bothered by the timing. They allege that the two attorneys in question had to have played a part in the motion since the motion was filed within hours and, the EEOC claims, the new council couldn't have been brought up to speed that quickly.
This would, if true, be both a conflict of interest and a violation of legal ethics as you cannot be part of an investigation and filing, and then also represent a party opposed to that same investigation and filing. The EEOC filing even states that when questioned about this potential conflict of interest on a conference call, the 2 DFEH lawyers in question disconnected from the call.
The EEOC states that "There can be no claim that there was timely 'isolation of [these] lawyer[s] from any participation' in representing DFEH in connection with the intervention proceedings, as would be necessary to show that timely screening took place. Thus, all DFEH attorneys were and should remain barred from representing DFEH in this matter."
We'll have to wait and see if this has any impact on either filing, but I certainly wouldn't enjoy being the judge assigned either of these cases at the moment.
About the Author
Mike “Magicman” Byrne has been a part of the MMOBomb family for years and serves as the site’s current Editor-in-Chief. His love for MMOs and gaming in general has led him to covering games for numerous websites including Gamebreaker TV and XIV Nation where he proudly displays his fanboy flag for FFXIV:ARR.
You May Enjoy
Is Marvel's Avengers Dead? Looks Like Disney Will Have The Final Say With Embracer's Purchase of Crystal Dynamics
Will Disney allow for Embracer to continue to make new Marvel titles, or will Disney say ‘no’ in a bigger plan?By Aspen Pash - 2 weeks ago
Smite's Doing a Slipknot Crossover – Because, Why Not?
There's apparently a trebuchet push mechanic, too.By QuintLyn Bowers - 1 week ago
V Rising Gameplay - A First Look From The Shadows (B2P)
Stay out of the sun and check out V Rising in our official video.By Michael Byrne - 8 hours ago
Nexon’s Pretty Pleased With Its 2022 First Quarter Earnings
Go figure that mobile games make money.By QuintLyn Bowers - 1 week ago
Minion Masters Patch 1.35 Is Out Now Making Things A Bit Colder
Players are introduced to two brand new cards to unleash upon their foes.By Aspen Pash - 1 week ago
Epic Games Is Giving Fortnite The Roblox Treatment By Releasing An Unreal Editor For It
The company plans to support creators building businesses around the game.By QuintLyn Bowers - 6 days ago